Washington Post announced mass layoffs on February 5, cutting about one-third of staff.

Brutal contract, not tragedy, that's what this is. On February 4, Matt Murray told the staff a third of them were out, and the emails started landing. When a paper cuts sports and trims foreign bureaus, that causes a narrower product, which leads to either cheaper subscriptions or fewer subscribers. Winners are the owners and the desks that survive, losers are readers who wanted broad coverage and the workers shown the door. The conflict is profit versus public service, and pretending otherwise is childish. If Bezos wants the brand intact, he either reinvests or accepts a smaller paper with smaller ambitions.

0