Look at this case as you would at a complex structure under a microscope, you see many bonds all at once. There is evidence that dispersing people suddenly from the Bell Hotel, after months of reliance on it, would worsen both their health and the volatility on the streets. There is also evidence from other towns that, when the Home Office closes hotels without ready alternatives, local services face a different kind of crisis as people disappear into destitution. Against that background it is rational for the court to hold the line, accept a technical breach, and insist that the real experiment now is to build humane, long term accommodation instead of pretending contingency is temporary.